One exchange (out of several) experienced technical difficulties (related to being hacked) and suspended trading for a week. Other exchanges kept trading and held the exchange value between 14$-17$. It currently trades at 16.8$.
used to buy Alpaca wool socks and illegal drugs
There is a wide variety of goods&services that's growing daily that you can pay for with Bitcoins. Among them are PC-hardware, Coffee in NYC, IT Consulting, Programming, Webdesign, Web-Hosting and many more. Comparision to other "e-currencies" not thought trough
have been many attempts at creating online currencies — including Digicash, Flooz, and Beenz.
It isn't exactly relevant to compare Bitcoin to these currencies. Beenz and Flooz were value substitutes entirely controlled by a single party. They could only be exchanged by involving that party. Inevitably these parties fell on hard times at some point or another, and had to cease operating, at which point exchange became impossible. That makes them a bad comparision to Bitcoin which is guaranteed not to fall prey to central control and floundering businesses that'd make their exchange impossible. Digicash may have been somewhat similar to Bitcoin, but there are two key differences. Digicash may have been anonymous and somewhat decentralized in exchange, yet the minting of new coins and the client software itself were in the control of a single party. Inevitably when Digicash failed (to run a sound business) Digicash (the currency) became impossible to trade. Therefore the comparision of Bitcoin with these failed "e-currencies" is only insofar of interest as it provides ample evidence of what exactly Bitcoin did better, namely two things:
There is no central mint (central bank or what have you), new coins are minted by a collective effort
There is no central control that would make it infeasible to exchange bitcoins, therefore there is no central attack (like the one by CC companies) that could "kill" it just like that.
Small change is irrelevant to the discussion of Bitcoin
A historical look at currencies over the last 500 years reveals an interesting insight — a key limiting factor to adopting currencies has been the ability to make small change.
The smallest unit of bitcoins is 0.00000001 btc. (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/FAQ#How_divisible_are_Bitcoins?). At currently traded (16.8$/btc) that would be 0.000000168$. Bitcoin payments can be specified down to that smallest unit, and there does not have to be any "change". Therefore both the numeration and the precision of payment argument is not relevant. Marginal costs and benefits misconception
But they never caught on because their marginal costs to consumers and merchants exceeded their marginal benefits.
In order to understand the motivation behind bitcoin, it's important to understand the limitations (or costs) of CC and Paypal payment processors. The Paypal issues
Paypal payments in sum incur about 7.5% in transaction cost.
Paypal payments (especially to merchants) are often delayed, withheld or entirely nulled by Paypal. Merchants have no recourse in this.
The Paypal payment processor API is quite convoluted and integrating it is far from easy. Merchants are at the whim of Paypal, and Paypal often decides not to carry a merchant without any reason specified.
If Paypals system go down, or are unavailble, e-commerce built on top of Paypal stops.
The CC in general issues
CC payments are subject to fees ranging between 2-10% Merchant protection with CCs is better, but by no means flawless. The CC payment processors offered are not technically simple to integrate
CC Merchant fees can be substantial Lower fees are offered by third parties, but again (like Paypal) a Merchant is at the whim of these third-parties.
*What Bitcoin does better
Bitcoin does not have forced transaction fees. There is an optional transaction fee, whose sole purpose is to incentivize the faster processing of the transaction by the network. However payments involving no txfees are equally possible (and practised widely).
The Bitcoin API is supremely easy to talk to, and it is a pleasure to implement. It can be acomplished by any programmer in a couple of minutes. And you do not need to sign neither any contract nor ask any permission to do it.
Since bitcoins are not centrally controlled, a merchant is not at the whim of any second or third party.
Bitcoins have no cost (marginal or otherwise) but substantial benefits
CC/Paypal have substantial cost and substantial drawbacks
Repeated misleading allusions as to questionable legality
Is It Legal? as a way to pay anonymously for illegal drugs sold on Silk Road – is the one that has been referred to the U.S. Attorney General as a violation of money laundering statutes. Mann notes that Bitcoin’s ultimate ambition well might be illegal After all, he points out, there are federal statutes that make it illegal to produce a separate currency.
Two main thrusts are presented by you as to the legality of Bitcoins. First you question businesses that use them of being in violation of money laundering laws. Second you allude to the legality of alternative currencies. Both of these things are not issues for the following reasons:
Businesses that accept Bitcoins can easily be required to conform to existing money-laundering laws. The medium of exchange does not change the rules that businesses must play by.
Bitcoins are actually less anonymous then the USD. That is because every transaction of bitcoins is publicly accessible. That means that it is a whole lot easier to follow a money trail in Bitcoins then it is to follow it in USD.
Alternative currencies are not illegal under EU and US laws. After all the exchange of foreign currencies certainly is not. What is certainly illegal is to establish a currency pegged to the national currency such as to represent a stand-in. This would give rise to issues with the central mint of the national currency. The Bitcoin value is not in any way pegged or related to the USD (or any other national currency). It is determined by the exchanges that trade Bitcoins.
Even if by some heavy-handed lawmaking Bitcoins would be deemed illegal, it would prove hard indeed to stamp them out. They are a truly decentralized and international system. They cannot be centrally attacked, so there is no "mint to shutdown" or business to bankrupt etc.
Consumers and Merchants pickup
Unless consumers and merchants can be persuaded that adopting it will make them better off, it’s likely to go the way of other online currencies.
This is an astute observation and I applaud it for that. However as a system Bitcoins do not depend (financially) on that pickup, and the speculative part of the Bitcoin economy will be able to live quite a while entirely without it. That being said, there is some pickup of bitcoin in genuine e-commerce and other fields. Closing Bitcoin has many desirable qualities, from an organizational, economic and technical point of view. Your article is not a very good representation of Bitcoin as it is, nor of what it can be, or what it's core issues really are. I'd invite you to write a retraction and correction in your next article and consult a Bitcoin specialist for review and input. If against all "odds" Bitcoin should prove to be more successful then you thought, think of it as collateral for your journalistic integrity. You can read comments about this open letter on the reddit post about it: http://www.reddit.com/Bitcoin/comments/ic92x/open_letter_to_forbes_peter_cohan/ Kind Regards, Florian Bösch TL;DR Peter Cohan has a poor grasp of bitcoins and presents a number of fallacious arguments that are not relevant.
You, bitcoin-currency-trader, are the biggest threat to your own investment. Not China or your Gov., but you, not spending them.
Are you holding on to your bitcoin in the hope that at some moment in future you can sell them for Euro, Dollar or Yen? Then you are the biggest threat to the value of Bitcoin. The very thing you are hoping for: to get rich (or make a few bucks) by holding on to your bitcoin-wallet untill it is worth more dollars, is the very thing that is keeping bitcoin away from increasing in price in a sustainable way. You are the reason it keeps bubble-ing and crashing: not China, nor your government regulating stuff, but you: keeping actual value away from Bitcoin.
The value of a bitcoin is a function of many parameters, the most important being: "what can I buy with it, in future".
Right now, the vast mayority of "stuff being bought" is other money: i.e. trade for Yen/DollaEur etc.
This gives a bitcoin a value which is extremely volatile and rediculously fragile.
We need a value that is less liquid: shops, companies, startups: people, careers, goods: not just harddrives holding Shasums, but an actual economy.
Every bitcoin is that held back in hope to sell it for more dollars in future, is a bitcoin not invested in this solid value. Is a bitcoin that is effectively without value other then the bigger fool maybe buying it from you at some point. For dollars. Even if all you want, is the value to grow because you see it as investment and nothing more, you'd still benefit from actually participating in the Bitcoin economy: it's the only thing that will make that investment grow in value. Sure, you can hope "someone else" makes that investment; but then there will be a moment when there are just too little "someone else's" and the value of your investement will collapse too. If Bitcoin fails to grow an actual economy, actual value, then yes, all these people shouting "tulip bulbs", or "ponzi" are right. The only way we can keep it from becoming "tulip bulbs" or "ponzis" is by giving Bitcoin actual value. So, start spending. Start a bitcoin-startup. Buy a pizza, buy coffee, alpaca socks and hardware. Especially when you are only "in it for the investment": spend a few percent. And for pete's sake: stop telling people how good an investment bitcoin is, and start explaining what else it is. (And yes, this has been said before, but it needs to be repeated, again. e.g. large media is talking about Bitcoin all the time: as investment, and hardly more)
One of the unofficial mascots for Bitcoin.. The connection between Bitcoin and the Alpaca likely originated from the February 10, 2011 post on Slashdot which described various goods and services could be purchased with bitcoins.Because the slashdot crowd has a tendency to be critical (they summarized Apple's 2001 iPod announcement as "lame", for instance) or humorous ("Do alpacas really wear ... Es hat sogar ein Lied mit dem Titel "Alpaca Socks", aka "The Bitcoin Song" inspiriert. "Vor kurzem wurden Alpaka-Socken in der" Bitcoin Kid "Interview von Stefan Thomas von Ripple während der Mai 2013 Bitcoin Konferenz in San Jose, CA. Sie können das Video hier ansehen. Nach der Bitcoin-Wiki-Seite hat sich die Bitcoin-Community auf die alpaka-Bitcoin-Verbindung verriegelt. Nachdem Bernard ... Most recently, alpaca socks were featured in the “Bitcoin Kid” interview of Stefan Thomas of Ripple during the May 2013 Bitcoin conference in San Jose, CA. You can view the video here . We already knew that Bitcoin and alpacas had a special “connection” since we published this article, where we suggested that you spend your digital currency buying super comfy alpaca socks. However, there’s much more to this story, since alpacas are being considered the unofficial mascot of the cryptocurrency world.. If you never saw an alpaca, we can tell you it looks a lot like a llama ... Aus Bitcoin Wiki. Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche. Alice ist weit weg von Bob und möchte seine Alpaka Socken für 5 Euro kaufen. 5 Euro sind ein Papierschein, welcher von Leuten im Tausch von Wertsachen (z.B. Bob's Socken) oder Dienstleistungen in der realen Welt akzeptiert wird. Alice könnte nun die 5 Euro in einen Briefumschlag stecken, an Bob senden und warten, dass Bob die Socken zu ihr ...
We Need a Dress Code at the Airport - Sebastian ... - YouTube
Marlou Volkerink inspireert haar volgers al jarenlang. In 2011 begon haar ondernemersavontuur met Follow Fashion. Daar kwam in 2015 Followfitgirls.com bij en... Impressum / Anbieterkennzeichnung Betreiber des Kanals ist Der Neue Wiesentbote c/o faktor i medienservice www.faktori.de Verantwortlich für diesen Kanal: Al... Sebastian Maniscalco complains about people who still pay with checks and talks about the pitfalls of shopping for clothes on clearance. Subscribe to Comedy Cen... Sebastian is hilarious! https://sebastianlive.com/ In unserem Kanal stellen wir euch Planungshilfen, Konfiguratoren und Visualisierungstools vor, die euch beim Einrichten und Planen eurer Wohnung helfen und i...